Sprogkyndig
ildsjæl søges til at korrekturlæse nedenstående
artikel, som nu er oversat til dansk. Skriv til os om dine muligheder
for at yde et bidrag
The Ten Most
Common Misconceptions About Apparitions
By Kevin
Orlin Johnson
Every day, it seems, the papers are splashed with another report of an
angel appearing by a hospital bed, the Blessed Virgin's image showing
up in a window screen, or the face of Christ appearing on yet another
tortilla. Many Catholics find these reports embarrassing. But then there
are sites like Lourdes or Fatima, places that nobody would have heard
of except for the reports that Mary appeared there and conveyed messages
of hope and repentance.
So, what's
the deal, when it comes to reported apparitions? Arguments break out;
accusations and contradictions are slammed back and forth by both sides.
There are a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings, no matter where
you look or whom you listen to. Here are the top ten contenders
1. People who believe that stuff are crazy
Well, now, hang on a minute. "Apparition" just means that a
heavenly beingChrist, Mary, another saint, or an angel makes
himself known to human senses. That being the case, pick up your Bible
and check Genesis: The first apparitions were to Adam and Eve when God
appeared to Moses and spoke to him in the burning bush. Carry it through
to the Annunciation, the Nativity, and the Resurrection. Look at the Apocalypse,
in which John describes his vision of the whole heavenly Jerusalem.
The whole Bible is the transcript of one apparition after another. Every
Mass includes Christ's apparition among usin the appearance of bread
and wine. If it's crazy to believe in apparitions, then every Jew and
every Christian who ever lived would have to be crazy.
2. Real apparitions come only to exceptionally holy
people
You'd be surprised. Bernadette was a remarkably sweet-natured child before
Mary appeared to her, and she got even better afterwards, but at the time
she was totally ignorant of her catechism and not unusually pious. Melanie
Matthieu, on the other hand, was practically a feral child before the
apparition at La Salette in 1848, and her teachers described her afterwards
as a complete savage. She later became a vagrant, running all over Europe
denouncing the Church for refusing to pay her saintly honors during her
lifetime. To take a middle case, Marie Lataste (1822-1847) started life
as a remarkably obnoxious little girl in Dax, France, but then Christ
started appearing to her almost routinely after her first Communion. Her
vices disappeared, her virtues grew, and those around her felt an abiding
sense of joy, just from her presence, although she never went out of her
way to impress them. (The surprising thing was that she wasn't surprised
at all of this; evidently she thought that's the way religion works, and
you have to admit she had a point. It just happened faster with her.)
Anyway, it just goes to show you that God picks up his tools as he will,
and that he doesn't always pick the sharpest knife in the drawer (Judg.
6:15, Matt. 9:9-13, Acts 9:1-4).
3. People claim to see apparitions just to get in the
spotlight
That one happens to be true. Not in all cases, though, but in most. Overwhelmingly,
the two greatest causes of reports of apparitions are human fraud and
human delusion; then, in terms of frequency, there are the diabolic high
jinks that almost always help the frauds along. Least frequent of all
is a genuine outreach by God, either directly from Christ or through Mary,
another saint, or an angel as intermediary.
The
genuine ones come, invariably, to people who didn't want them before
they happened, who later wish that they hadn't had them, or who don't
want them at all, ever. The modesty of their conduct contrasts sharply
with the posturings of the fakes and the deluded. Declining to pose
as a divine messenger with more authority than Christ, or even refusing
to claim to speak for him, is really about the barest minimum of humility
a person can have, yet the overwhelming majority of self-declared mystics
trip over that very low threshold. The minute you see self-proclaimed
visionaries giving interviews to the press, dashing off reams of prophecies
for all and sundry, asserting that they've seen Mary and that they have
an urgent message that can save the world; the minute you see someone
even permitting himself to be interviewed on such a matter; certainly
as soon as you see a reported visionary routinely blessing people, "curing"
pilgrims, or even receiving pilgrims at allyou can safely assume
that the person is a fraud or, if you want to be particularly charitable,
that the person is deluded, genuinely believing that what he said he
saw was real. Either way, it's not worthy of your attention.
Here, as in so much else, John of the Cross is the best model. When
dispatched to investigate a reported apparition, he walked cheerfully
up to the woman and said, "Are you the lady to whom the Holy Spirit
is appearing?" When she answered "Yes!," he bid her good
day and reported to the bishop that the woman was either a fraud or
delusional. Credit-worthy visionaries speak of "the Lady"
or "the person," but they don't even claim that it was Mary
or Christ.
4. You can tell if a reported apparition is real because
miraculous things happen around it
Miracles are distinct kinds of mystic phenomena, entirely separate from
apparitions and not necessarily occurring anywhere near them.
Incidentally, one thing that's practically the hallmark of a false apparition
is the report that a set of rosary beads has changed color.
5.
I'll see an apparition some day
Not likely, this side of Armageddon. It's an outreach by God, and you
can't compel God. Thinking that he owes an apparition to you, that you've
earned it, or even that you deserve it, is pridea cardinal vice
that puts a stop to even the possibility, not to mention to further
personal growth. "I consider it certain," Teresa of Avila
said, "that spiritual persons who think that they deserve these
delights of spirit for the many years that they have practiced prayer
will not ascend to the summit of the spiritual life," which is
in line with Matthew 12:39 and 23:12 and everything else that the Church
teaches. John of the Cross attributed the taste for these experiences
to a "spiritual sweet tooth," a matter of unwholesome greed.
It makes a person an enemy of Christ, he said. Or, as Bernard put it,
a soul striving toward union with God "will be far from content
that her Bridegroom should manifest himself to her in the common manner,
that is, by . . . dreams and visions."
The best advice? Stick to the sacraments and the normal spiritual discipline
of the Church. Remember what Therese of Lisieux, one of the most influential
of the Church's mystics, said: "To ecstasy, I prefer the monotony
of sacrifice."
6. People who don't bother with modern apparitions
just aren't spiritually gifted enough to understand
No, they're within their rights, and they're doing basically what the
Church hopes people will do. Belief even in events like Lourdes or Fatima
is only permitted, never required. No such event is necessary for salvation
or for the business of the Church; like Christ's own miracles, they
only help bring people's attention back to the faith (John 3:1-21).
No latter-day apparition should be taken as the centerpiece of one's
ideas about what religion is all about. That's because Christianitya
revealed religionworks with two different kinds of revelation.
The revelation that came to us from Christ, through the prophets before
him and the apostles after, is an unchanged body of teachings called
the "deposit of faith," and it's public revelation, so called
because Christ said that it was to be given to all nations (Matt. 24:14,
28:19; Mark 11:17, 13:10; Luke 24:47). It's the substance of our religion.
Since the death of the last apostle, public revelation is closed. Everything
that God needed to reveal about Christianity already has been revealed,
so nothing needs to be added; Christ himself revealed it, so nothing
has to be changed. "The Christian dispensation." Vatican II
repeated, "as the new and definitive covenant, will never pass
away, and we now await no further new public revelation before the glorious
manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ."
But there's also a phenomenon called private revelation. This is not
part of public revelation, but just a reminder of some part of it, given
by God, sometimes by way of an angel or a saint, to an individual person.
It can be the answer to a simple prayer or a sky-splitting apparitionor
anything in between. Whatever the form, it's not essential to the faith.
No genuine apparition is going to be anything other than private revelation;
none will convey new or revised public revelation, so none is necessary
to the substance of the faith. You're supposed to take the reminder,
if you need it, and then get to your devotion to public revelation.
That's why even spectacularly gifted saints can take apparitions or
leave them. Louis of France looked up calmly when his servant burst
into the room yelling about how Christ was appearing in the Eucharist
in the palace chapel, and then the king turned back to his work. Margaret
Mary Alacoque and Teresa of Avila went so far as to fight off their
visions of Christ, begging him to leave them in the normal routine of
their orders. If you stay at home when the next visionary claims that
Mary is appearing in the back yard, you'll be in very good company.
7. Bishops encourage crowds to flock to any reported
apparition, no matter how nutty it is
Just about the last thing any bishop looks forward to is that late-night
call about yet another hometown visionary. His efforts will be directed
at keeping things orderly until an investigation can be madeif
in fact the report warrants investigation. Usually, the thing is so
far outside the spectrum of genuine mystic activity that he'll respond
only with silence, and silence from the local bishop is really a public
proclamation that the thing deserves no notice. Even if it does turn
out to be real, the most that any post-biblical apparition gets is a
negative approvalan official declaration that there's nothing
in the report or in its implications that's contrary to the faith, so
that it's "worthy of belief." That means that you can believe
it or, if you aren't interested, not.
8. Bishops discourage people from flocking to any
reported apparition, no matter how wonderful it is
Wrong again. They know that only a tiny percentage of reportsmaybe
only one in a thousand, or really even fewer turn out to have
anything wonderful about them. To the average bishop, the overwhelming
majority of reports is obviously, even blatantly fraudulent or delusional.
There is an immense amount of spiritual treasure in the messages of
genuine apparitions, a lot that can deepen and enrich your life in the
Church through the sacraments. But it's also true that fakes and delusional
cases distract thousands of people from basicand fully adequateparticipation
in those sacraments, and they draw them away from growing in the normal
life of prayer. So the good of a real apparition is potentially overwhelmed
by the evil from a myriad of fakes. Bishops have to be careful.
Those reports that have enough substance to merit official examination
are studied by panels of qualified experts theologians, medical
doctors, perhaps chemists and physicists assembled by the local
bishop, the only person authorized by law to investigate. They take
their time. Time weeds out empty promises, and it may take a century
or more before a final determination is announced. In the meantime,
follow the lead of King Louis or of John of the Cross, who just turned
back to reading his Bible when his brother friars called him to run
into town to see a purported apparition. Maybe he was looking at Matthew
12:38-39.
9. If enough people go to see an apparition, the bishop
will give it his blessing eventually
A genuine apparition is an outreach by God. The reality of it is not
determined by voting and most particularly not by the voting of people
unqualified to evaluate the matter. We tend to forget that mystic theology
is a regular academic disciplineyou can get a doctorate in it,
at accredited Catholic universities. It's sobering but safe to remember
that the layman-on-the-street has no experience of genuine mystic activity,
no book-learning about what it really is, and judging by the numbers
who flock after even the most preposterous reportssadly insufficient
knowledge about the basics of the faith. A little learning goes a long
way toward winnowing out the nonsense. You'd be surprised how far it
goes toward opening up the wonders of the apparitions that have been
declared worthy of credit, wonders that are closed to people who rely
on their emotions and won't make the necessary effort to grow in knowledge
and discipline.
Most experts, undoubtedly, would just like to see a little more common
sense in these things. Christianity does not change (Heb. 13:8-9), so
certainly an apparition of a saint (Matt. 17:3) or an angel (Luke 1:11)
is as possible today as it ever was. But there's no biblical reference
for the appearance of anybody's face on a food item or flower petals.
Lack of biblical precedent should be enough to turn anybody from the
silliest reports, but there are also the writings of the great Doctors
of the Church such as Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross, which ought
to settle any doubts the laity is likely to have about the value of
a given report, pending official judgmentor official silence.
By the way, continuing to fuss with a purported apparition that has
been declared false by the local bishop is disobedience: a sin rooted
in pride.
10. Apparitions can be photographed
Nope.
Kevin Orlin Johnson is the author of Apparitions:
Mystic Phenomena and
What They Mean.
He resides in Dallas.
©
This Rock, Catholic Answers, P.O. Box 17490, San Diego, CA 92177,
(619) 541-1131.
|